One morning, I noticed something curious in my city. Within just a few hours, I saw three different versions of the same brand: the REMAX logo from 2005 on a moving truck, their 2017 logo on a for-sale sign, and the latest 2025 version on a bus shelter ad. Three identities, one brand—coexisting in plain sight. I call this “brand residue”: the traces left behind each time a brand changes its skin. While designers are eager to celebrate the new, ordinary people are still making sense of the old.
But here’s the truth: Rebranding is never just about looking fresh. It’s about protecting what people remember—and risking what they might forget.
This article is part of Branding Strategy Insider’s newsletter. You can sign up here to get thought pieces like this sent to your inbox.
Why The Past Never Fully Disappears
Every rebrand leaves two types of residue:
When big companies rebrand, massive marketing budgets can erase confusion by drowning consumers in the new identity. For smaller organizations, however, clarity and coherence aren’t luxuries—they’re lifelines.
Fear Is Not A Strategy
Since the early 2000s, the pace of rebranding has accelerated—driven by digital trends, shifting generations, and the fear of seeming outdated. But a redesigned logo can’t fix a weak business promise or an unclear strategy. As Mark Di Somma aptly stated, “Every decision to change a name destroys part of the equity that name has built.” Change is never neutral.
International Lessons In Residue
This phenomenon extends far beyond North America:
- Leeds United (UK): In 2018, the beloved football club tried to modernize its crest, removing the white rose. Fans rebelled—and the club swiftly backpedaled, restoring their heritage after global ridicule.
- Royal Mail (UK): After briefly rebranding as “Consignia” in 2001 to signal global ambitions, public backlash forced a rapid return to the historic Royal Mail name.
- Tropicana (US, Canada): In 2009, a packaging overhaul erased their iconic orange-with-a-straw image. Sales plummeted by 20% within two months, as loyal customers failed to recognize the brand on shelves.
- Mastercard (global): Their early 2000s logo tweak, adding a third circle, was so poorly received that the company quickly reverted to the universally known two-circle design.
- Facebook/Meta (global): The rebrand to “Meta” in 2021 left many confused, blurring product and corporate identities and sparking criticism about the brand’s credibility and focus.
What The Data Shows In 2025
Recent research underscores the high stakes:
- Nielsen (2025): 40% of rebranding campaigns fail to deliver a positive ROI. Up to 20% sales drops have resulted from poorly received changes, especially when customer research is insufficient.
- 65% of consumers say they maintain emotional loyalty to brands with a consistent identity and message.
- The vast majority of large organizations (74%) attempt a rebrand every seven years—but only those who manage transition and memory succeed.
When Trust And Recognition Erode
Why do even the best intentions go awry?
- Trust weakens with inconsistency: Every unaligned logo, outdated template, or mixed message chips away at consumer confidence.
- Recognition fragments: The brain prefers cognitive shortcuts—too many changes, and audiences simply check out, or worse, choose competitors.
- Marketing dollars are wasted correcting confusion: For every dollar spent promoting the new, another is spent repairing what was lost.
Principles for Rebranding Without Losing What Matters
- Validate The Necessity : Never let discomfort—or trend anxiety—justify change. If a rebrand doesn’t serve a clear business goal, it may be cosmetic, not strategic.
- Measure What People Recognize : Test shapes, colors, words, and feelings your audience truly remembers. A logo can evolve, but mental shortcuts are harder to rewire.
- Audit All Old Assets: Map your “brand ecosystem”—from vehicles to PDFs—and plan to phase out or update what remains. Residue unmanaged becomes residue uncontrolled.
- Preserve a Thread of Continuity: Anchor the redesign in a recognizable feature. Make it clear: we’ve evolved, you’re still home.
- Explain The Why: Not Just the What, Tell your audience how and why the brand is changing, inviting them to update their own mental model alongside your transformation.
- Phase Your Rollout: Don’t flip the switch overnight. Start with public-facing assets, monitor effects, and update gradually.
- Monitor for Lingering Residue : After launch, track where the old brand persists—in physical assets or public memory—and treat these as valuable feedback.
- Let Meaning Drive Design: Don’t chase novelty for its own sake. The most coherent brands evolve with purpose, not just style.
Effective Brands Evolve, They Don’t Disappear
Brands aren’t campaigns or logos—they’re living stories built over time. Each rebrand adds a chapter, but the old pages remain beneath. The strongest brands don’t reinvent; they reincorporate, layering innovation onto memory. Change what you must—but never lose sight of what your customers already know and love.
What you do next won’t just define your brand’s future. It will decide which memories—and whose trust—you carry forward.
Contributed to Branding Strategy Insider by Martin Ducharme, Brand Strategist & Creative Thinker
At The Blake Project, we help clients worldwide, in all stages of development, define and articulate what makes them competitive at pivotal moments of change. Please email us to learn how we can help you compete differently.
Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Growth, and Brand Education
Post Views: 56
