Reality Check: Can Perovskite Really Outshine Silicon PV?

Sign up for CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and/or follow us on Google News!

Perovskite solar is getting another moment in the sun, with outlandish claims matched by a lack of global perspective on advances. It’s worth stepping carefully through the various dimensions of this photovoltaic technology, weighing what enthusiasts say against what’s demonstrably true today. In doing so, it’s obvious that perovskite’s pathway to mass-market viability is neither straightforward nor guaranteed, particularly when compared to silicon PV, the already scaled and thoroughly dominant technology.

Starting with longevity, perovskite puff pieces keep claiming breakthroughs to achieving silicon-like durability, capable of surviving decades in the field. The reality, however, is significantly less impressive. While accelerated laboratory tests do indeed show stability improvements—some cells retaining 95% or more of their efficiency after 1,000 hours under intense heat and UV—real-world, multi-year field trials are sparse and less optimistic. Perovskite’s inherent chemical sensitivity to moisture, oxygen, heat, and ultraviolet radiation—you know, everything that solar panels deal with every single day—means that even the best solutions will struggle to reliably approach silicon’s 25–30 year lifespan, and it will be years of operation before longevity is known and quantified. Oxford PV, a leading firm in perovskite development, asserts that its tandem perovskite-silicon modules could last 25 years, but independent long-term field validation remains thin. Claims about long-term durability remain hypothetical, resting heavily on accelerated but carefully controlled lab tests rather than sustained outdoor performance data.

Efficiency is another dimension where perovskites generate tremendous excitement. Headlines routinely tout laboratory efficiencies well above 25%, occasionally hitting remarkable numbers near 30%. However, these efficiency claims often drop significantly as cells scale up from tiny laboratory prototypes to commercial-sized modules. Perovskite–silicon tandem cells from research groups regularly reach efficiencies beyond 30%, but when Oxford PV recently launched its first commercially available modules, efficiencies hovered around 24.5%. In China, companies like LONGi Solar and MicroQuanta are producing initial batches of tandem and perovskite-only modules with efficiencies ranging between 18% and 25%, still trailing behind state-of-the-art silicon modules routinely delivering over 22%. Perovskite’s laboratory successes have yet to translate fully into the large-scale modules needed to meaningfully challenge silicon’s market dominance.

Lead toxicity remains perhaps the most publicly controversial dimension of perovskites. While researchers regularly propose lead-free perovskites, none yet achieve the efficiencies or stability of lead-based versions, the ones that still haven’t demonstrated the real world efficiencies or stability of silicon PV. Most commercially relevant perovskite formulations contain lead iodide, a highly water-soluble and toxic compound that raises environmental and regulatory red flags. While industry players often assure that effective encapsulation and recycling methods mitigate risks, the reality is that standardized, industrial-scale recycling infrastructure does not yet exist. As highlighted in recent studies, the potential environmental risk remains considerable, particularly if perovskite modules were to proliferate at scale. Encapsulation techniques undoubtedly improve lead containment, but the eventual end-of-life handling of perovskite modules remains unresolved, creating a real barrier to their widespread adoption.

Flexibility is often touted as one of perovskite’s key differentiators. Indeed, researchers have successfully fabricated small flexible perovskite cells on substrates such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), achieving around 17% efficiency per recent studies. In theory this opens attractive niches, like wearable electronics or building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV), all of which get headlines leading mostly fluffy articles. However, these flexible perovskite modules face severe real-world engineering challenges. The thin films are brittle and susceptible to cracks and degradation when repeatedly flexed or exposed to harsh environmental conditions. To be efficient and to last more than weeks, thin films have to use lead it appears, and cracking, leaking lead on human skin or buildings humans use just isn’t going to be a thing. I’m deeply skeptical of promised perovskite thin film applications as a result.

Turning to cost, perovskite advocates frequently claim dramatic reductions in manufacturing costs compared to silicon, with projections of less than $0.20 per watt often cited. Real-world economic modeling paints a more nuanced picture. According to detailed techno-economic analyses by institutions like the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), current perovskite module manufacturing costs remain closer to $0.38–$0.50 per watt at smaller production scales—still above silicon’s well-established market price of roughly $0.20 per watt or lower. While perovskite production methods like low-temperature solution processing do offer theoretical cost advantages, actual costs remain elevated due to lower yields, challenges in process uniformity, and difficulties scaling up from lab to factory. Until perovskite manufacturers achieve silicon-like yields, scale, and quality control, the promised dramatic cost advantage remains speculative at best.

The scalability of perovskite technology has been another key selling point. Enthusiasts frequently promote perovskites as inherently suitable for roll-to-roll printing and high-volume continuous manufacturing. In practice, though, scaling perovskite production has proven challenging. Companies such as China’s UtmoLight and GCL have indeed launched pilot lines capable of manufacturing perovskite modules at modest scales, reporting efficiencies in the range of 16–18%. However, scaling perovskite production beyond pilot-level manufacturing—towards the gigawatt-level factories common in the silicon PV industry—has proven significantly more difficult than anticipated. According to reports from early perovskite module producers, uniform coating, film homogeneity, and quality control remain persistent challenges, resulting in lower efficiencies and uncertain reliability when scaled beyond laboratory prototypes.

There have been success with tandem silicon-perovskite panels, layering a metal-organic film into the silicon mix, gaining increased overall efficiencies as the two materials harvest more of the sunlight. But these panels are expensive, much more complicated than silicon alone, and unproven in real world solar farms. Oxford PV’s tandem panels have a customer in an undisclosed US utility-scale solar farm, but no one is talking about how much they cost and their real world performance yet. It’s not even clear they’ve shipped the panels yet.

Finally, the real-world commercialization status of perovskite technology warrants sober consideration. Although recent developments like Oxford PV’s tandem modules or MicroQuanta’s modest deployments represent important first steps, the global cumulative deployment of perovskite solar cells today remains minuscule—a few tens of megawatts at most. This contrasts sharply with silicon PV, a fully mature technology already approaching two terawatts of cumulative installations worldwide, according to the International Energy Agency. Silicon factories operate routinely at scales of multiple gigawatts per year, with production costs, reliability, and efficiency consistently meeting market expectations. Perovskite PV, while undoubtedly promising in theory, remains firmly in the early commercialization phase, trailing silicon PV by several orders of magnitude in installed capacity, manufacturing maturity, and overall market confidence.

While enthused western headlines are mostly about tiny western firms, of course China is the one trying to scale perovskites seriously. Companies such as UtmoLight, GCL Group, Renshine Solar, and Wonder Solar are already constructing facilities with planned capacities ranging from one to multiple gigawatts, aiming for tandem and single junction module efficiencies between 16% and an ambitious 26% for GCL’s tandem panels. Yet, it’s crucial to place these ambitious perovskite projects in context: China’s current silicon PV industry boasts an overwhelming manufacturing scale of roughly 1.6 terawatts—orders of magnitude larger than even the most optimistic perovskite projections. Silicon PV remains firmly entrenched, and while the scale of these perovskite factories appears large to western eyes, they are just as likely to fail as to succeed. They are side bets.

The strategic outlook related to perovskite demands skepticism rather than unbridled enthusiasm. Industry stakeholders should continue supporting focused perovskite research, setting clear technical milestones related to durability, efficiency, and manufacturing yields. Investment, both private and public, would be wise to condition further support upon tangible demonstrations of perovskite PV meeting concrete, rigorous benchmarks, particularly around lifetime and environmental impact. Policymakers, in turn, might prudently structure incentives so that perovskite deployment expands incrementally and carefully, closely monitored for real-world performance.

Perovskite solar cells represent one of the more interesting technological developments in photovoltaics over the past decade. However, the gulf between hopeful claims and verified realities remains considerable. Silicon PV’s entrenched dominance—built on proven long-term reliability, scale, and affordability—is unlikely to be overturned, in my opinion.