Noam Glick spent years learning the law from the inside — watching how large companies defended themselves against employee claims and studying how those defenses were constructed. When he switched sides in 2014, he brought that institutional knowledge with him. The result is Glick Law Group, a Los Angeles-based firm that represents employees exclusively and draws on a background few plaintiff-side attorneys can claim.
From Environmental Policy to the Courtroom
Noam Glick’s path to employment law was not direct. He began his academic career at the University of California, Santa Cruz, earning a degree in economics and environmental studies. That interdisciplinary focus — understanding both markets and ecosystems — signaled an early interest in systems and the people affected by them. He deepened that interest with a Master’s in Public Policy from the University of Michigan, then moved to Washington D.C. to work as an environmental policy consultant.
Policy work gave Noam Glick a clear view of how rules are written and who benefits when they are enforced. It also clarified what he wanted to do next. Advocacy — direct, consequential, and personal — drew him toward law. He enrolled at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, where he graduated cum laude in the top 10% of his class, earned a full-ride scholarship, and served as an editor of the Loyola Law Review. After graduation, he secured a federal clerkship with the Honorable Gary Klausner of the U.S. District Court, Central District of California — a placement that sharpened his understanding of federal civil litigation at the highest level.
Years on the Defense Side — and What They Revealed
Following his clerkship, Noam Glick joined the defense bar. He worked at several of the most respected law firms in the country, defending large corporations against employment claims brought by workers. He was effective. He understood how defense teams built their cases, where they pressed, and where they held back.
But the work became increasingly difficult to reconcile with his own values. In the plaintiffs he was fighting, he saw people he recognized — employees who had been passed over, retaliated against, wrongfully terminated, or denied wages they had rightfully earned. Many of them had legitimate grievances and no real voice. The asymmetry was hard to ignore.
That recognition became a turning point. Noam Glick concluded that his skills — honed over years of high-stakes defense litigation — were more useful on the other side of the table. In 2014, he left the defense world and founded Glick Law Group.
A Practice Built on Institutional Knowledge
What distinguishes Noam Glick’s approach is what he brought with him from the defense side. He understands how large employers think about employment disputes, how they evaluate risk, and how their legal teams structure a defense. That perspective shapes how he builds and presents his cases on behalf of workers.
Glick Law Group represents employees in matters touching on worker’s rights, employment law, consumer protection, and environmental protection. The firm’s focus is deliberate: by representing only employees, Glick Law Group avoids the conflicts of interest that come with a mixed practice and allows Noam Glick to concentrate entirely on the side of the dispute where he believes his work has the most value.
This positioning — a plaintiff’s attorney with deep defense-side experience — is uncommon. It gives clients access to an advocate who knows precisely what the opposing team is likely to argue, and who has spent years understanding how to counter it.
Why Workers’ Rights Require Skilled Advocacy
Employment disputes are rarely straightforward. A worker alleging wrongful termination faces an employer with resources, institutional memory, and legal counsel that may have handled dozens of similar claims. The documentation, the procedural knowledge, and the negotiating leverage are rarely on the employee’s side at the outset.
Effective representation in these cases requires more than legal knowledge. It requires an understanding of how employers document decisions, how HR processes are designed to limit liability, and how large organizations respond when a claim is filed. Noam Glick developed that understanding from the inside. The years he spent defending companies were, in effect, a study in how employment claims are defeated — and how that dynamic can be reversed.
For workers navigating disputes without the institutional resources of their employer, that kind of experience on their side changes the equation.
A Career Shaped by Conviction
Noam Glick‘s career has moved through several distinct phases — policy, law school, federal clerkship, defense litigation, and ultimately, plaintiff-side practice. Each transition reflected a deliberate reassessment of where his work could matter most. The decision to found Glick Law Group was not a departure from a successful career; it was the logical conclusion of one.
His academic credentials — UC Santa Cruz, University of Michigan, Loyola Law School — gave him the analytical foundation. His years at the defense bar gave him the practical expertise. His clerkship with Judge Klausner gave him a federal litigator’s perspective on how courts evaluate these cases. Together, those experiences produce a practice built on something more durable than a marketing narrative: a genuine understanding of both sides of the employment dispute.
About Noam Glick
Noam Glick is the founder of Glick Law Group, an employment law firm based in Los Angeles that represents employees exclusively. He earned his undergraduate degree from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and his Master’s in Public Policy from the University of Michigan. He graduated cum laude from Loyola Law School, where he served as an editor of the Loyola Law Review, before completing a federal clerkship with the Honorable Gary Klausner, U.S. District Court, Central District of California. Prior to founding Glick Law Group in 2014, Noam Glick spent years as a defense-side employment attorney at some of the most prominent law firms in the United States. His practice areas include employment law, worker’s rights, consumer protection, and environmental protection.
